Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has suggested a seventy percent tax rate on the super profits of the very rich. The very suggestion of the rich paying their fair share has caused controversy among conservatives and in the media. But is taxing the rich at seventy percent really that radical? Libertarian Charles Sauer thinks so, debating Thom Hartmann on the effects and history of higher taxes on the rich. Does taxing the rich at higher rates help democracies function or do they slow innovation, as Charles Sauer believes?
Democracy is an illusion! It’s become a political system fostered by the élite, for the élite, in order to fool the people that they have a stake in the system. In actual fact, they have virtually none. The whole political system in the modern era, despite having noble beginnings, is now used to benefit the few at the expense of the many. – Mark Alexander, June 29, 2018
Thursday, 21 February 2019
Libertarian Takes on Democratic Socialist on Taxes and Loses. Again (2019)
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has suggested a seventy percent tax rate on the super profits of the very rich. The very suggestion of the rich paying their fair share has caused controversy among conservatives and in the media. But is taxing the rich at seventy percent really that radical? Libertarian Charles Sauer thinks so, debating Thom Hartmann on the effects and history of higher taxes on the rich. Does taxing the rich at higher rates help democracies function or do they slow innovation, as Charles Sauer believes?
Labels:
Charles Sauer,
taxation,
the superrich,
Thom Hartmann